A Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of ASPIC+ and DeLP

DOI10.1017/S1471068419000437zbMath1472.68189arXiv1909.02810OpenAlexW2979638768MaRDI QIDQ4957198

Henry Prakken, Guillermo R. Simari, Alejandro Javier García

Publication date: 3 September 2021

Published in: Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.02810

zbMATH Keywords

defeasible logic programming\(\mathit{ASPIC}^+\)rule-based argumentation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Logic programming (68N17)

Related Items (4)

When is argumentation deductive? ⋮ Automatic knowledge generation for a persuasion dialogue system with enthymemes ⋮ Incremental computation for structured argumentation over dynamic DeLP knowledge bases ⋮ Towards Evidence Retrieval Cost Reduction in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Fallible Evidence

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• A general account of argumentation with preferences
• Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
• A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
• On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
• Abstract argumentation systems
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Implementing crash-resistance and non-interference in logic-based argumentation
• Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
• Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
• A logic-based theory of deductive arguments

This page was built for publication: A Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of ASPIC⁺ and DeLP