Bias and High-Dimensional Adjustment in Observational Studies of Peer Effects
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4999123
DOI10.1080/01621459.2020.1796393zbMath1464.62526arXiv1706.04692OpenAlexW3043736046MaRDI QIDQ4999123
Publication date: 6 July 2021
Published in: Journal of the American Statistical Association (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.04692
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Bootstrapping data arrays of arbitrary order
- The statistical mechanics of best-response strategy revision
- The pigeonhole bootstrap
- Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Results for Dartmouth Roommates
- From Natural Variation to Optimal Policy? The Importance of Endogenous Peer Group Formation
- A New Criterion for Confounder Selection
- Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
- Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem
- On the Failure of the Bootstrap for Matching Estimators
- Causal Inference in Hybrid Intervention Trials Involving Treatment Choice
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
- Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme
- On the Role of the Propensity Score in Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects
- Inference on Treatment Effects after Selection among High-Dimensional Controls
- Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data
- Two-Stage Least Squares Estimation of Average Causal Effects in Models with Variable Treatment Intensity
- Approximate Residual Balancing: Debiased Inference of Average Treatment Effects in High Dimensions
- Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences
- Can Nonrandomized Experiments Yield Accurate Answers? A Randomized Experiment Comparing Random and Nonrandom Assignments
- Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score
