DISCRETE CHOICE AND RATIONAL INATTENTION: A GENERAL EQUIVALENCE RESULT

DOI10.1111/IERE.12469zbMath1467.91030arXiv1709.09117OpenAlexW2586222447WikidataQ104111464 ScholiaQ104111464MaRDI QIDQ4999799

Mogens Fosgerau, André de Palma, Matthew Shum, Emerson Melo

Publication date: 2 July 2021

Published in: International Economic Review (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.09117

zbMATH Keywords

discrete choicerational inattentionBregman information costrational inattention models

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06)

Related Items (9)

How McFadden met Rockafellar and learned to do more with less ⋮ When is coarseness not a curse? Comparative statics of the coarse random utility model ⋮ A random attention and utility model ⋮ Strategic mistakes ⋮ Identification of a rational inattention discrete choice model ⋮ Estimation of disaggregate Huff and \textit{Kaiyu} Markov model: a lecture note on conditional logit model ⋮ Dogit model and rational inattention ⋮ On the uniqueness of quantal response equilibria and its application to network games ⋮ Network manipulation algorithm based on inexact alternating minimization

This page was built for publication: DISCRETE CHOICE AND RATIONAL INATTENTION: A GENERAL EQUIVALENCE RESULT