Design and analysis considerations for comparing dynamic treatment regimens with binary outcomes from sequential multiple assignment randomized trials
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5036410
DOI10.1080/02664763.2017.1386773OpenAlexW2761659193WikidataQ60697532 ScholiaQ60697532MaRDI QIDQ5036410
Qui Tran, Daniel Almirall, Nicholas J. Seewald, Connie Kasari, Kelley M. Kidwell
Publication date: 23 February 2022
Published in: Journal of Applied Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc6290910
sample sizesequential multiple assignment randomized trialdynamic treatment regimesadaptive interventionsinverse-probability-of-treatment weighting
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Association, causation, and marginal structural models.
- Sample size formulae for two-stage randomized trials with survival outcomes
- Supremum weighted log-rank test and sample size for comparing two-stage adaptive treatment strategies
- Models for Longitudinal Data: A Generalized Estimating Equation Approach
- Adaptive Treatment Strategies in Practice
- Marginal Mean Models for Dynamic Regimes
- A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect
This page was built for publication: Design and analysis considerations for comparing dynamic treatment regimens with binary outcomes from sequential multiple assignment randomized trials
