Publication Policies for Replicable Research and the Community-Wide False Discovery Rate
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5050813
DOI10.1080/00031305.2021.1999857OpenAlexW3208837888WikidataQ128727268 ScholiaQ128727268MaRDI QIDQ5050813
Publication date: 18 November 2022
Published in: The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2021.1999857
\(p\)-valuestatistical significancefalse discovery ratelocal false discovery ratefalse positivereplicable research
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Modelling publication bias and p-hacking
- Microarrays, empirical Bayes and the two-groups model
- The positive false discovery rate: A Bayesian interpretation and the \(q\)-value
- Testing precise hypotheses. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors
- Unified frequentist and Bayesian testing of a precise hypothesis. With comments by Dennis V. Lindley, Thomas A. Louis and David Hinkley and a rejoinder by the authors
- The ASA President's task force statement on statistical significance and replicability
- Revised standards for statistical evidence
- Simultaneous Testing of Grouped Hypotheses: Finding Needles in Multiple Haystacks
- Oracle and Adaptive Compound Decision Rules for False Discovery Rate Control
- Empirical Bayes Analysis of a Microarray Experiment
- Adaptive False Discovery Rate Control for Heterogeneous Data
- Operating Characteristics and Extensions of the False Discovery Rate Procedure
- Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Interpreted and Calibrated by Estimating Probabilities of Sign Errors: A Bayes-Frequentist Continuum
- Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Defended and Calibrated by Bayesian Model Checking
- Reconnecting p-Value and Posterior Probability Under One- and Two-Sided Tests
- Calibration ofρValues for Testing Precise Null Hypotheses
- Covariate-Assisted Ranking and Screening for Large-Scale Two-Sample Inference
- Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”
- What Have We (Not) Learnt from Millions of Scientific Papers with P Values?
- Will the ASA's Efforts to Improve Statistical Practice be Successful? Some Evidence to the Contrary
- Before p < 0.05 to Beyond p < 0.05: Using History to Contextualize p-Values and Significance Testing
- Large-Scale Replication Projects in Contemporary Psychological Research
- The p-Value Requires Context, Not a Threshold
- A Proposed Hybrid Effect Size Plus p-Value Criterion: Empirical Evidence Supporting its Use
- The False Positive Risk: A Proposal Concerning What to Do About p-Values
- Abandon Statistical Significance
- Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication
- Coup de Grâce for a Tough Old Bull: “Statistically Significant” Expires
- The World of Research Has Gone Berserk: Modeling the Consequences of Requiring “Greater Statistical Stringency” for Scientific Publication
- The Detection of Nonnegligible Directional Effects With Associated Measures of Statistical Significance
- The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
- Why should clinicians care about Bayesian methods? (With discussions and response)
This page was built for publication: Publication Policies for Replicable Research and the Community-Wide False Discovery Rate
