Improving Effect Estimates by Limiting the Variability in Inverse Propensity Score Weights
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5056978
DOI10.1080/00031305.2020.1737229OpenAlexW3009394516MaRDI QIDQ5056978
Keith Kranker, Laura Blue, Lauren Vollmer Forrow
Publication date: 14 December 2022
Published in: The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2020.1737229
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators
- Demystifying double robustness: a comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data
- Comment: Performance of double-robust estimators when ``inverse probability weights are highly variable
- Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward
- Covariate balancing propensity score for a continuous treatment: application to the efficacy of political advertisements
- Matching for balance, pairing for heterogeneity in an observational study of the effectiveness of for-profit and not-for-profit high schools in Chile
- Efficient semiparametric estimation of multi-valued treatment effects under ignorability
- Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
- Model-Based Direct Adjustment
- Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences
- Stable Weights that Balance Covariates for Estimation With Incomplete Outcome Data
- Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score
- Covariate Balancing Propensity Score
- Full Matching in an Observational Study of Coaching for the SAT
- A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement From a Finite Universe
- Random forests
This page was built for publication: Improving Effect Estimates by Limiting the Variability in Inverse Propensity Score Weights
