Positive algorithmic bias cannot stop fragmentation in homophilic networks

DOI10.1080/0022250X.2020.1818078zbMath1484.91337arXiv2001.02878OpenAlexW2999628059WikidataQ81630197 ScholiaQ81630197MaRDI QIDQ5070525

Taha Yasseri, Chris Blex

Publication date: 13 April 2022

Published in: The Journal of Mathematical Sociology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.02878

zbMATH Keywords

social networkshomophilyecho chambersalgorithmic biasschelling model

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social networks; opinion dynamics (91D30)

Cites Work

• Unperturbed Schelling segregation in two or three dimensions
• Fixation in the one-dimensional Axelrod model
• Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
• Dynamic models of segregation†
• Global Village or Cyber-Balkans? Modeling and Measuring the Integration of Electronic Communities
• Exponential Segregation in a Two-Dimensional Schelling Model with Tolerant Individuals
• Digital morphogenesis via Schelling segregation
• A DYNAMIC MODEL OF RESIDENTIAL SEGREGATION
• Emergence of segregation in evolving social networks
• An analysis of one-dimensional schelling segregation
• A Schelling model with switching agents: decreasing segregation via random allocation and social mobility

This page was built for publication: Positive algorithmic bias cannot stop fragmentation in homophilic networks