Comparison between Bayesian approach and frequentist methods for estimating relative risk in randomized controlled trials: a simulation study

DOI10.1080/00949655.2016.1222610OpenAlexW2518213330WikidataQ60731990 ScholiaQ60731990MaRDI QIDQ5106808

K. Nourijelyani, Leila Janani, Kazem Mohammad, Mahmood Mahmoodi, Mohammad Ali Mansournia, Kamran Mehrabani

Publication date: 22 April 2020

Published in: Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2016.1222610

zbMATH Keywords

simulationrelative riskBayesian approachrandomized controlled trialsbinary outcomelog-binomial regression

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Uses Software

• R
• WinBUGS
• R2WinBUGS
• geepack
• BayesDA
• PROC GENMOD

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• An objective Bayesian estimation of parameters in a log-binomial model
• Slice sampling. (With discussions and rejoinder)
• Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities
• Adaptive Rejection Metropolis Sampling within Gibbs Sampling
• Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
• Quasi-likelihood estimation for relative risk regression models

This page was built for publication: Comparison between Bayesian approach and frequentist methods for estimating relative risk in randomized controlled trials: a simulation study