Recommended methods to compare the accuracy of two binary diagnostic tests subject to a paired design
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5107475
DOI10.1080/00949655.2019.1628234OpenAlexW2949635306WikidataQ127702691 ScholiaQ127702691MaRDI QIDQ5107475
J. A. Roldán Nofuentes, Saad Bouh Sidaty-Regad
Publication date: 27 April 2020
Published in: Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2019.1628234
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Two-tailed approximate confidence intervals for the ratio of proportions
- An improved confidence interval for a linear function of binomial proportions
- Simultaneous testing of McNemar's problem for several populations
- Considering the Concordant Observations in Likelihood Ratio Test for Paired Binary Data
- A Revised Version of McNemar's Test for Paired Binary Data
- Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine
- Significance Tests in Discrete Distributions
- Global Hypothesis Test to Simultaneously Compare the Predictive Values of Two Binary Diagnostic Tests in Paired Designs: a Simulation Study
- Approximate confidence intervals for the weighted kappa coefficient of a binary diagnostic test subject to a case–control design
- Two-tailed asymptotic inferences for a proportion
- Tests of Statistical Hypotheses Concerning Several Parameters When the Number of Observations is Large
This page was built for publication: Recommended methods to compare the accuracy of two binary diagnostic tests subject to a paired design