Equal Area Rule to Adjudicate Conflicting Claims
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5111110
DOI10.1007/978-3-319-93809-7_14zbMath1443.91178OpenAlexW2947872882MaRDI QIDQ5111110
Publication date: 26 May 2020
Published in: Studies in Economic Design (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93809-7_14
2-person games (91A05) Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models (91B26) Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32)
Cites Work
- Let them cheat!
- The pseudo-average rule: bankruptcy, cost allocation and bargaining
- Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
- Equal or proportional division of a surplus, and other methods
- Distributive justice in taxation
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- The bankruptcy problem: A cooperative bargaining approach
- Bilateral comparisons and consistent fair division rules in the context of bankruptcy problems
- The area monotonic solution to the cooperative bargaining problem
- A noncooperative view of consistent bankruptcy rules
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards.
- Duality, area-considerations, and the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution
- The two-agent claims-truncated proportional rule has no consistent extension: a constructive proof
- Dynamics and axiomatics of the equal area bargaining solution
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
- On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach
- The Bargaining Problem
- A quadratic programming model for product configuration optimization
- How to Divide When There Isn't Enough
- Noncooperative Foundations of the Area Monotonic Solution
This page was built for publication: Equal Area Rule to Adjudicate Conflicting Claims
