Problems with Existing Procedures to Calculate Exact Unconditional P‐Values for Non‐Inferiority/Superiority and Confidence Intervals for Two Binomials and How to Resolve Them
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5122588
DOI10.1002/BIMJ.200410086zbMath1442.62588OpenAlexW2015940547WikidataQ42677348 ScholiaQ42677348MaRDI QIDQ5122588
Publication date: 23 September 2020
Published in: Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200410086
Related Items (10)
Efficient calculation of test sizes for non-inferiority ⋮ Locally correct confidence intervals for a binomial proportion: A new criteria for an interval estimator ⋮ Contemporary frequentist views of the \(2\times 2\) binomial trial ⋮ Exact approaches for testing non-inferiority or superiority of two incidence rates ⋮ ASSESSING TEST SIZES FOR THE FARRINGTON-MANNING TEST ⋮ Constructing tests to compare two proportions whose critical regions guarantee to be Barnard convex sets ⋮ Practical valid inferences for the two-sample binomial problem ⋮ Accurate unconditional p-values for a two-arm study with binary endpoints ⋮ Exact unconditional testing procedures for comparing two independent Poisson rates ⋮ Interpreting \(p\)-values and confidence intervals using well-calibrated null preference priors
This page was built for publication: Problems with Existing Procedures to Calculate Exact Unconditional P‐Values for Non‐Inferiority/Superiority and Confidence Intervals for Two Binomials and How to Resolve Them
