Assessing the Amount of Heterogeneity in Random‐Effects Meta‐Analysis

DOI10.1002/BIMJ.200510175zbMath1442.62446OpenAlexW2090771116WikidataQ83366223 ScholiaQ83366223MaRDI QIDQ5122814

Guido Knapp, Brad J. Biggerstaff, Joachim Hartung

Publication date: 24 September 2020

Published in: Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200510175

zbMATH Keywords

hypothesis testingconfidence intervalbinary responsenormal responsebetween-trial variance

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Related Items (5)

Quantifying uncertainty in method of moments estimates of the heterogeneity variance in random effects meta‐analysis ⋮ The diamond ratio: A visual indicator of the extent of heterogeneity in meta‐analysis ⋮ When should meta‐analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions? ⋮ Treatment-effect estimates adjusted for small-study effects via a limit meta-analysis ⋮ Generalised interval estimation in the random effects meta regression model

This page was built for publication: Assessing the Amount of Heterogeneity in Random‐Effects Meta‐Analysis