How to compare interpretatively different models for the conditional variance function
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5123593
DOI10.1080/02664760902984642OpenAlexW2089032691MaRDI QIDQ5123593
Ilmari Juutilainen, Juha Röning
Publication date: 29 September 2020
Published in: Journal of Applied Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760902984642
variance functionpredictive likelihoodconditional variancepredictive densitylog-scoring rulemodel performance measureout-of-sample testing
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Predictive density and conditional confidence interval accuracy tests
- Estimation of the confidence limits for the quadratic forms in normal variables using a simple Gaussian distribution approximation
- Constructing Bayesian formulations of sparse kernel learning methods
- A TEST FOR COMPARING MULTIPLE MISSPECIFIED CONDITIONAL INTERVAL MODELS
- Robust Linear Model Selection by Cross-Validation
- Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation
- Tests of Conditional Predictive Ability
- Probabilistic Forecasts, Calibration and Sharpness
- Likelihood-Based Local Linear Estimation of the Conditional Variance Function
This page was built for publication: How to compare interpretatively different models for the conditional variance function