Completeness, Categoricity and Imaginary Numbers: The Debate on Husserl

DOI10.18778/0138-0680.2020.07zbMath1446.03009OpenAlexW3039273558MaRDI QIDQ5126208

Víctor Aranda

Publication date: 15 October 2020

Published in: Bulletin of the Section of Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.18778/0138-0680.2020.07

zbMATH Keywords

completenesscategoricityHusserlimaginary numbersrelative and absolute definiteness

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

History of mathematics in the 20th century (01A60) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) History of mathematical logic and foundations (03-03) History of mathematics in the 19th century (01A55)

Related Items (1)

Completeness: from Husserl to Carnap

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Husserl and Hilbert on completeness, still
• Towards completeness: Husserl on theories of manifolds 1890--1901
• Logic and philosophy of mathematics in the early Husserl
• Husserl and Hilbert on completeness. A neglected chapter in early twentieth century foundations of mathematics
• Husserl's two notions of completeness. Husserl and Hilbert on completeness and imaginary elements in mathematics
• Husserl on completeness, definitely
• Completeness and Categoricity. Part I: Nineteenth-century Axiomatics to Twentieth-century Metalogic

This page was built for publication: Completeness, Categoricity and Imaginary Numbers: The Debate on Husserl