Crowdvoting Judgment: An Analysis of Modern Peer Review

DOI10.1287/stsy.2019.0053zbMath1466.62444OpenAlexW3033133635MaRDI QIDQ5126317

Michael R. Wagner

Publication date: 16 October 2020

Published in: Stochastic Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/stsy.2019.0053

zbMATH Keywords

random walkscrowdsourcingsequential hypothesis testingonline communitiescrowdvoting

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to social sciences (62P25) Voting theory (91B12) Sequential statistical analysis (62L10) Sequential estimation (62L12) Anomalous diffusion models (subdiffusion, superdiffusion, continuous-time random walks, etc.) (60K50)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Thirteen theorems in search of the truth
• When is Condorcet's jury theorem valid?
• Voting Behavior and Information Aggregation in Elections With Private Information
• The Optimal Decision Rule for Fixed-Size Committees in Dichotomous Choice Situations: The General Result
• On the Capacity of Information Processing Systems
• Budget-Optimal Task Allocation for Reliable Crowdsourcing Systems
• Optimum Character of the Sequential Probability Ratio Test
• Sequential Tests of Statistical Hypotheses

This page was built for publication: Crowdvoting Judgment: An Analysis of Modern Peer Review