Evaluating competing theories via a common language of qualitative verdicts

DOI10.1007/s11229-015-0929-4zbMath1360.03052OpenAlexW2116464345MaRDI QIDQ513944

Wulf Gaertner, Nicolas Wüthrich

Publication date: 8 March 2017

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/64151/7/W%C3%BCthrich_Evaluating%20competing%20theories_2015.pdf

zbMATH Keywords

social choice theoryscoring rulesepistemic valuestheory choiceThomas S. Kuhn

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14) Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Related Items (2)

Objectivity, ambiguity, and theory choice ⋮ The limitations of the Arrovian consistency of domains with a fixed preference

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• A general scoring rule
• Arrow's theorem and theory choice
• Formal utilitarianism and range voting
• On Weights and Measures: Informational Constraints in Social Welfare Analysis
• A theory of measuring, electing, and ranking

This page was built for publication: Evaluating competing theories via a common language of qualitative verdicts