A normative framework for argument quality: argumentation schemes with a Bayesian foundation

DOI10.1007/s11229-015-0815-0zbMath1360.03030OpenAlexW2310731632MaRDI QIDQ513988

Jos Hornikx, Ulrike Hahn

Publication date: 8 March 2017

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0815-0

zbMATH Keywords

evidencerationalityinferenceargumentationtestimony

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Related Items (3)

Logic, Reasoning, Argumentation: Insights from the Wild ⋮ A probabilistic analysis of argument cogency ⋮ Credence for conclusions: a brief for Jeffrey's rule

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Justification by infinite loops
• A Bayesian approach to informal argument fallacies
• The carneades model of argument and burden of proof
• Argumentation machines. New frontiers in argument and computation.
• Thirteen theorems in search of the truth
• Believing more, risking less: On coherence, truth and non-trivial extensions
• Reliability conducive measures of coherence
• DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions
• Perception as Bayesian Inference

This page was built for publication: A normative framework for argument quality: argumentation schemes with a Bayesian foundation