Why the quantitative condition fails to reveal quantum adiabaticity

DOI10.1088/1367-2630/16/5/053023zbMath1451.81239arXiv1403.0069OpenAlexW3101861688MaRDI QIDQ5143212

Dafa Li, Man-Hong Yung

Publication date: 11 January 2021

Published in: New Journal of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.0069

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Quantum dynamics and nonequilibrium statistical mechanics (general) (82C10) Semiclassical techniques, including WKB and Maslov methods applied to problems in quantum theory (81Q20)

Related Items (1)

Quantum artificial neural networks with applications

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Adiabatic theorem without a gap condition
• Adiabatic perturbation theory in quantum dynamics
• A Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm Applied to Random Instances of an NP-Complete Problem
• Validity of the quantum adiabatic theorem
• Bounds for the adiabatic approximation with applications to quantum computation
• Adiabatic approximation with exponential accuracy for many-body systems and quantum computation
• Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes
• Adiabatic Quantum State Generation
• Bound States in Quantum Field Theory
• Consistency of the adiabatic theorem

This page was built for publication: Why the quantitative condition fails to reveal quantum adiabaticity