Understanding negation implicationally in the relevant logic R
From MaRDI portal
Publication:514515
DOI10.1007/S11225-016-9676-XzbMath1417.03167OpenAlexW2412341804MaRDI QIDQ514515
Publication date: 2 March 2017
Published in: Studia Logica (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-016-9676-x
Related Items (2)
Disentangling structural connectives or life without display property ⋮ Bridging the Two Plans in the Semantics for Relevant Logic
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- On when a semantics is not a semantics: some reasons for disliking the Routley-Meyer semantics for relevance logic
- Negation in the context of gaggle theory
- Dual intuitionistic logic and a variety of negations: the logic of scientific research
- The American plan completed: Alternative classical-style semantics, without stars, for relevant and paraconsistent logics
- The semantics of entailment. II
- Displaying and deciding substructural logics. I: Logics with contraposition
- Relevant logic and the theory of information
- Display logic
- Constructive negation, implication, and co-implication
- Defining double negation elimination
- A star-free semantics for R
- The Semantics of First Degree Entailment
This page was built for publication: Understanding negation implicationally in the relevant logic R
