Union of Two Arithmetic Progressions with the Same Common Difference Is Not Sum-dominant
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5148775
zbMath1460.11030arXiv1906.03793MaRDI QIDQ5148775
Publication date: 5 February 2021
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.03793
Other combinatorial number theory (11B75) Additive bases, including sumsets (11B13) Arithmetic progressions (11B25)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Generalized more sums than differences sets
- Sets characterized by missing sums and differences
- Constructing MSTD sets using bidirectional ballot sequences
- Explicit constructions of infinite families of MSTD sets
- On the number of sums and differences
- When almost all sets are difference dominated
- On A Conjecture of Conway
- When Sets Can and Cannot Have MSTD Subsets
- Fringe pairs in generalized MSTD sets
- Explicit Constructions of Large Families of Generalized More Sums Than Differences Sets
- Generalizations of a Curious Family of MSTD Sets Hidden By Interior Blocks
- Sets of Cardinality 6 Are Not Sum-dominant
- Infinite Families of Partitions into MSTD Subsets
- Finding and Counting MSTD Sets
- When Sets Are Not Sum-dominant
- Some explicit constructions of sets with more sums than differences
- On Conway's Conjecture for Integer Sets
- On Conway's conjecture for integer sets
This page was built for publication: Union of Two Arithmetic Progressions with the Same Common Difference Is Not Sum-dominant