I don’t care, I don’t know … I know too much! On Incompleteness and Undecidedness in Abstract Argumentation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5172620
DOI10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_18zbMath1432.68423OpenAlexW578981112MaRDI QIDQ5172620
Beishui Liao, Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin
Publication date: 4 February 2015
Published in: Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_18
Related Items (3)
An abstract argumentation and logic programming comparison based on 5-valued labellings ⋮ On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation ⋮ A general semi-structured formalism for computational argumentation: definition, properties, and examples of application
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Toward incremental computation of argumentation semantics: a decomposition-based approach
- On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks
- Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
- On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
- How to reason defeasibly
- The value of the four values
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Contradictory information: too much of a good thing
- Fibring argumentation frames
- On topology-related properties of abstract argumentation semantics. A correction and extension to ``Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
- Parameterized Splitting: A Simple Modification-Based Approach
- On the acceptance of loops in argumentation frameworks
- Splitting an Argumentation Framework
- Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
- Partial semantics of argumentation: basic properties and empirical
This page was built for publication: I don’t care, I don’t know … I know too much! On Incompleteness and Undecidedness in Abstract Argumentation
