What Is a Reasonable Argumentation Semantics?

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_21zbMath1432.68440OpenAlexW806912432MaRDI QIDQ5172623

Sebastian Rudolph, Sarah A. Gaggl, Michaël Thomazo

Publication date: 4 February 2015

Published in: Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_21

zbMATH Keywords

complexityexpressivenessabstract argumentationinvariance under modifications

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Related Items (1)

Paracoherent Answer Set Semantics meets Argumentation Frameworks

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks
• Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation
• Graph theoretical structures in logic programs and default theories
• On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
• Coherence in finite argument systems.
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Stage semantics and the SCC-recursive schema for argumentation semantics
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• A knowledge-based approach to adversarial decision making
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty

This page was built for publication: What Is a Reasonable Argumentation Semantics?