A conflict between some semantic conditions of Carmo and Jones for contrary-to-duty obligations

DOI10.1007/s11225-016-9686-8zbMath1417.03154arXiv2008.12827OpenAlexW2517542782MaRDI QIDQ519858

Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen

Publication date: 7 April 2017

Published in: Studia Logica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.12827

zbMATH Keywords

contrary-to-duty obligationsdeontic logicChisholm's paradox

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Modal logic (including the logic of norms) (03B45) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Related Items (1)

Designing normative theories for ethical and legal reasoning: \textsc{LogiKEy} framework, methodology, and tool support

Cites Work

• Handbook of philosophical logic. Vol. 8
• Counterfactuals and comparative possibility
• Chisholm’s Paradox and Conditional Oughts
• Completeness and decidability results for a logic of contrary-to-duty conditionals
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: A conflict between some semantic conditions of Carmo and Jones for contrary-to-duty obligations