Longitudinal and time‐to‐drop‐out joint models can lead to seriously biased estimates when the drop‐out mechanism is at random
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5214442
DOI10.1111/BIOM.12986zbMath1436.62645OpenAlexW2898265081WikidataQ57784722 ScholiaQ57784722MaRDI QIDQ5214442
Christos Thomadakis, Loukia Meligkotsidou, Giota Touloumi, Nikos Pantazis
Publication date: 7 February 2020
Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12986
Directional data; spatial statistics (62H11) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Missing data (62D10)
Related Items (3)
Predictors of refraction prediction error after cataract surgery: a shared parameter model to account for missing post-operative measurements ⋮ Biased estimation with shared parameter models in the presence of competing dropout mechanisms ⋮ Rejoinder to “Biased Estimation With Shared Parameter Models in the Presence of Competing Dropout Mechanisms”
This page was built for publication: Longitudinal and time‐to‐drop‐out joint models can lead to seriously biased estimates when the drop‐out mechanism is at random