MODAL STRUCTURALISM AND REFLECTION

DOI10.1017/S1755020318000138OpenAlexW2807866738WikidataQ129685623 ScholiaQ129685623MaRDI QIDQ5216972

Sam Roberts

Publication date: 20 February 2020

Published in: The Review of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755020318000138

zbMATH Keywords

modal logiclarge cardinalsset theoryreflection principlesstructuralismplural logicmodal structuralism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Modal logic (including the logic of norms) (03B45) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Large cardinals (03E55) Axiomatics of classical set theory and its fragments (03E30) Philosophy and mathematics (educational aspects) (97E20) Logic (educational aspects) (97E30)

Related Items

Putnam on Mathematics as Modal Logic

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Classes and truths in set theory
• Modalising plurals
• Set theory. An introduction to large cardinals
• Principles of partial reflection in the set theories of Zermelo and Ackermann
• On the Question of Absolute Undecidability
• Boolos on the justification of set theory
• Structuralism Without Structures
• Structuralism's Unpaid Epistemological Debts
• A STRONG REFLECTION PRINCIPLE
• On the significance of the Burali-Forti paradox
• Plural Quantification and Classes†
• INDISPENSABILITY ARGUMENTS AND INSTRUMENTAL NOMINALISM
• THE POTENTIAL HIERARCHY OF SETS
• Models of Second-Order Zermelo Set Theory
• Nominalism Through De‐Nominalization
• Plural Quantification Exposed
• Sets and Classes
• A hierarchy of formulas in set theory
• Does Mathematics Need New Axioms?
• On reflection principles