A comparison of two varying coefficient meta-analysis methods for an average risk difference

DOI10.1080/00949655.2014.929132zbMath1457.62090OpenAlexW2094073157MaRDI QIDQ5220874

Douglas G. Bonett, Robert M. Jun. Price

Publication date: 27 March 2020

Published in: Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7vx0r4cj

zbMATH Keywords

meta analysisrisk differenceadjusted Wald interval

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Parametric tolerance and confidence regions (62F25) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Cites Work

• An improved confidence interval for a linear function of binomial proportions
• A note on confidence interval estimation for a linear function of binomial proportions
• New large-sample confidence intervals for a linear combination of binomial proportions
• Variance Stabilizing the Difference of Two Binomial Proportions
• Simple and Effective Confidence Intervals for Proportions and Differences of Proportions Result from Adding Two Successes and Two Failures
• Analysis of Categorical Data by Linear Models
• Introduction to Meta‐Analysis
• Meta‐analysis methods for risk differences

This page was built for publication: A comparison of two varying coefficient meta-analysis methods for an average risk difference