Choquet Expected Utility Representation of Preferences on Generalized Lotteries
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5230079
DOI10.1007/978-3-319-08855-6_45zbMath1422.91245OpenAlexW140952860MaRDI QIDQ5230079
Davide Petturiti, Barbara Vantaggi, Giulianella Coletti
Publication date: 20 August 2019
Published in: Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08855-6_45
Related Items (3)
Preferences on Gambles Representable by a Choquet Expected Value with Respect to Conditional Belief and Plausibility Functions ⋮ A special class of fuzzy measures: Choquet integral and applications ⋮ Decision Rules Under Vague and Uncertain Information
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Inferential processes leading to possibility and necessity
- Lower previsions induced by multi-valued mappings
- Under stochastic dominance Choquet-expected utility and anticipated utility are identical
- Linear utility theory for belief functions
- How can an expert system help in choosing the optimal decision?
- Non-additive measure and integral
- Additive representations of non-additive measures and the Choquet integral
- Decision making in the TBM: the necessity of the pignistic transformation
- Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms
- “Lottery Equivalents”: Reduction of the Certainty Effect Problem in Utility Assessment
- Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity
- Integral Representation Without Additivity
- Toward a general theory of conditional beliefs
- Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping
This page was built for publication: Choquet Expected Utility Representation of Preferences on Generalized Lotteries