Bias correction of estimated proportions using inverse binomial group testing
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5234444
DOI10.1111/anzs.12255zbMath1420.62040OpenAlexW2934783065MaRDI QIDQ5234444
Publication date: 26 September 2019
Published in: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/285541
negative binomial distributionestimation of proportionsbias correctioninverse samplingpooled testinggroup testing design
Cites Work
- Improved estimation of proportions using inverse binomial group testing
- Bias correction in estimating proportions by pooled testing
- Confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions estimated from pooled samples
- Estimating disease prevalence using inverse binomial pooled testing
- The optimal group size using inverse binomial group testing considering misclassification
- A Two-Stage Adaptive Group-Testing Procedure for Estimating Small Proportions
- Exact Confidence Intervals for Proportions Estimated by Group Testing
- Sequentially Deciding between Two Experiments for Estimating a Common Success Probability
- Random walk designs for selecting pool sizes in group testing estimation with small samples
- Sequential estimation in the group testing problem
- Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates
- Group Testing for Sensitive Characteristics: Extension to Higher Prevalence Levels
- Screening
This page was built for publication: Bias correction of estimated proportions using inverse binomial group testing