Why scalar–tensor equivalent theories are not physically equivalent?

DOI10.1142/S0218271817501620zbMath1431.83150arXiv1609.01824OpenAlexW3103692038MaRDI QIDQ5242311

Nayem Sk, Abhik Kumar Sanyal

Publication date: 6 November 2019

Published in: International Journal of Modern Physics D (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.01824

zbMATH Keywords

equivalenceEinstein's frame\(F(R)\) theory of gravityJordan's frame

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Quantization of the gravitational field (83C45) Einstein's equations (general structure, canonical formalism, Cauchy problems) (83C05) Relativistic gravitational theories other than Einstein's, including asymmetric field theories (83D05)

Related Items (9)

Analyzing conserved currents in F(R) theory of gravity ⋮ Anisotropic and frame dependent chaos of suspended strings from a dynamical holographic QCD model with magnetic field ⋮ Noether symmetry in \(f(T)\) teleparallel gravity ⋮ Noether symmetry of Palatini F(ℜ) gravity ⋮ Hubble diagrams in the Jordan and Einstein frames ⋮ Canonical formulation of Pais–Uhlenbeck action and resolving the issue of branched Hamiltonian ⋮ Covariant singularities in quantum field theory and quantum gravity ⋮ A brief note on Weyl frames and canonical transformations in geometrical scalar–tensor theories of gravity ⋮ The role of cosmological constant in f(R, G) gravity

Cites Work

• Inequivalence of Jordan and Einstein frame: what is the low energy gravity in string theory?
• Higher-order corrections to the effective gravitational action from Noether symmetry approach
• Einstein frame or Jordan frame? Irreversibility and cosmology
• Why Noether symmetry of \(F(R)\) theory yields three-half power law?
• <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>theories of gravity
• BRANS–DICKE THEORY: JORDAN VERSUS EINSTEIN FRAME
• The Cauchy problem for the R+R2 theories of gravity without torsion
• Some aspects of the cosmological conformal equivalence between the `Jordan frame' and the `Einstein frame'
• Conformal equivalence and Noether symmetries in cosmology
• Isotropic universe with almost scale-invariant fourth-order gravity
• Mach's Principle and Invariance under Transformation of Units
• Validating variational principle for higher order theory of gravity
• General Relativity

This page was built for publication: Why scalar–tensor equivalent theories are not physically equivalent?