Classical Mechanics Is Lagrangian; It Is Not Hamiltonian

DOI10.1093/bjps/axs034zbMath1357.70003OpenAlexW2120229085MaRDI QIDQ5265969

Erik Curiel

Publication date: 29 July 2015

Published in: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/8625/1/cm-lag-not-ham.pdf

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Lagrange's equations (70H03) Axiomatics, foundations (70A05)

Related Items (11)

Glymour and Quine on theoretical equivalence ⋮ Theoretical equivalence in classical mechanics and its relationship to duality ⋮ Change in Hamiltonian general relativity from the lack of a time-like Killing vector field ⋮ Deformation quantization as an appropriate guide to ontic structure ⋮ On Einstein algebras and relativistic spacetimes ⋮ Theoretical equivalence and duality ⋮ Quine's conjecture on many-sorted logic ⋮ Spacetime structure ⋮ Fiber bundles, Yang-Mills theory, and general relativity ⋮ MORITA EQUIVALENCE ⋮ Why Not Categorical Equivalence?

This page was built for publication: Classical Mechanics Is Lagrangian; It Is Not Hamiltonian