A comparison of the Hosmer–Lemeshow, Pigeon–Heyse, and Tsiatis goodness-of-fit tests for binary logistic regression under two grouping methods
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5267883
DOI10.1080/03610918.2015.1017583zbMath1364.62105OpenAlexW2343885550MaRDI QIDQ5267883
Ronald Paul Barry, Jana D. Canary, Leigh Blizzard, David W. jun. Hosmer, Stephen Quinn
Publication date: 13 June 2017
Published in: Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2015.1017583
goodness-of-fitbinary logistic regressionHosmer-LemeshowPigeon-HeyseTsiatisdeciles-of-riskpartition the covariate space
Related Items
Is a Classification Procedure Good Enough?—A Goodness-of-Fit Assessment Tool for Classification Learning ⋮ Summary goodness-of-fit statistics for binary generalized linear models with noncanonical link functions
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- An omnibus lack of fit test in logistic regression with sparse data
- Increasing the power: a practical approach to goodness-of-fit test for logistic regression models with continuous predictors
- A Monte Carlo study of thirty internal criterion measures for cluster analysis
- Unified large-sample theory of general chi-squared statistics for tests of fit
- A note on a goodness-of-fit test for the logistic regression model
- Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model
- On Deriving the Inverse of a Sum of Matrices
- An Improved Goodness of Fit Statistic for Probability Prediction Models
- A Goodness-of-Fit Test for Binary Regression Models, Based on Smoothing Methods
- A cautionary note about assessing the fit of logistic regression models
- Performance of reclassification statistics in comparing risk prediction models
- A Chi-Square Statistic with Random Cell Boundaries
- The Use of Maximum Likelihood Estimates in $\chi^2$ Tests for Goodness of Fit
