COMPARISON OF DIRECT DIFFERENTIATION AND ADJOINT VARIABLE METHOD FOR ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE IMAGING

DOI10.1108/EB010332zbMath0772.65083OpenAlexW2014910873MaRDI QIDQ5288309

Janusz Sikora, Hyun-Kyo Jung, Song-Yop Hahn, Il-Han Park

Publication date: 2 September 1993

Published in: COMPEL - The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb010332

zbMATH Keywords

algorithmsensitivity analysisLaplace equationdirect differentiation methodadjoint variable method\(X\)-ray tomographynuclear magnetic resonance tomographyImpedance computed tomography

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

PDEs in connection with optics and electromagnetic theory (35Q60) Biomedical imaging and signal processing (92C55) Laplace operator, Helmholtz equation (reduced wave equation), Poisson equation (35J05) Finite difference methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs (65N06) Applications to the sciences (65Z05)

Cites Work

• Augmented integrated system optimisation and parameter estimation technique: derivation, optimality and convergence

This page was built for publication: COMPARISON OF DIRECT DIFFERENTIATION AND ADJOINT VARIABLE METHOD FOR ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE IMAGING