Which Canonical Algebras are Derived Equivalent to Incidence Algebras of Posets?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5301520
DOI10.1080/00927870802185989zbMath1196.16007arXiv0708.1412OpenAlexW2050061639MaRDI QIDQ5301520
Publication date: 20 January 2009
Published in: Communications in Algebra (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.1412
Representations of quivers and partially ordered sets (16G20) Representations of associative Artinian rings (16G10) Algebraic aspects of posets (06A11)
Related Items (8)
Finite gentle repetitions of gentle algebras and their Avella-Alaminos–Geiss invariants ⋮ On the Lie algebra structure of the first Hochschild cohomology of gentle algebras and Brauer graph algebras ⋮ Gerstenhaber algebra structure on the Hochschild cohomology of quadratic string algebras ⋮ Special multiserial algebras are quotients of symmetric special multiserial algebras ⋮ Injective presentations of induced modules over cluster-tilted algebras ⋮ On the wildness of Cambrian lattices ⋮ Hochschild cohomology of m-cluster tilted algebras of type 𝔸̃ ⋮ Piecewise hereditary incidence algebras
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Tame algebras and integral quadratic forms
- Iterated tilted algebras of type \({\tilde {\mathbb A}}_ n\)
- Coherent sheaves on \({\mathbb{P}}^n\) and problems of linear algebra
- On derived equivalences of categories of sheaves over finite posets
- On the dimension of objects and categories. II: Finite ordered sets
- A characterization of hereditary categories with tilting object
This page was built for publication: Which Canonical Algebras are Derived Equivalent to Incidence Algebras of Posets?