Collaborative vs. Conflicting Learning, Evolution and Argumentation

DOI10.1007/978-3-540-70829-2_5zbMath1181.68211OpenAlexW1531941332WikidataQ62038944 ScholiaQ62038944MaRDI QIDQ5302474

Alexandre Miguel Pinto, Luís Moniz Pereira

Publication date: 7 January 2009

Published in: Oppositional Concepts in Computational Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70829-2_5

zbMATH Keywords

inductive concept learning

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence (68T05)

Uses Software

• XSB

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Interactive concept-learning and constructive induction by analogy
• Dualities between alternative semantics for logic programming and nonmonotonic reasoning
• `Classical' negation in nonmonotonic reasoning and logic programming
• An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
• Strategies in combined learning via logic programs
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Belief revision via Lamarckian evolution
• Reasoning with logic programming
• Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation
• Learning cost-sensitive active classifiers
• Approved Models for Normal Logic Programs
• The well-founded semantics for general logic programs
• Logic programming and knowledge representation
• Constructive negation under the well-founded semantics
• Abduction over 3-valued extended logic programs
• Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning

This page was built for publication: Collaborative vs. Conflicting Learning, Evolution and Argumentation