WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF-EVIDENT: BUT WHAT DO WE MEAN BY THAT?

DOI10.1017/S175502030909011XzbMath1170.03003MaRDI QIDQ5323797

Stewart Shapiro

Publication date: 30 July 2009

Published in: The Review of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

self-evidence

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Related Items (10)

The Composition of Thoughts ⋮ Some obstacles facing a semantic foundation for constructive mathematics ⋮ Identity and the cognitive value of logical equations in Frege's foundational project ⋮ Set-theoretic justification and the theoretical virtues ⋮ Omnipresence, multipresence and ubiquity: kinds of generality in and around mathematics and logics ⋮ FREGE’S CONSTRAINT AND THE NATURE OF FREGE’S FOUNDATIONAL PROGRAM ⋮ Proving Things About the Informal ⋮ Inconsistency and Incompleteness, Revisited ⋮ On the virtue of categoricity ⋮ Moral Epistemology: The Mathematics Analogy

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Zermelo, reductionism, and the philosophy of mathematics
• 100 Years of Zermelo’s Axiom of Choice: What was the Problem with It?
• Categories, Structures, and the Frege-Hilbert Controversy: The Status of Meta-mathematics

This page was built for publication: WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF-EVIDENT: BUT WHAT DO WE MEAN BY THAT?