Choosing between methods of combining $p$-values
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5384581
DOI10.1093/biomet/asx076OpenAlexW2737838117MaRDI QIDQ5384581
Nicholas A. Heard, Patrick Rubin-Delanchy
Publication date: 24 June 2019
Published in: Biometrika (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06897
meta-analysisFisher's methodStouffer's methodPearson's methodTippett's methodEdgington's methodGeorge's method
Related Items (15)
General and feasible tests with multiply-imputed datasets ⋮ Transcription factor-centric approach to identify non-recurring putative regulatory drivers in cancer ⋮ Standardized Partial Sums and Products of p-Values ⋮ Combining independent p-values in replicability analysis: a comparative study ⋮ On Samuel's \(p\)-value model and the Simes test under dependence ⋮ Permutation testing for thick data when the number of variables is much greater than the sample size: recent developments and some recommendations ⋮ Power enhancement for testing multi-factor asset pricing models via Fisher's method ⋮ Combining p-values for Multivariate Predictive Ability Testing ⋮ Two-sample tests for high-dimensional covariance matrices using both difference and ratio ⋮ The role of the leverage effect in the price discovery process of credit markets ⋮ Some robust approaches based on copula for monitoring bivariate processes and component-wise assessment ⋮ PoolBal ⋮ Smaller $p$-values via indirect information ⋮ A unified treatment of multiple testing with prior knowledge using the p-filter ⋮ Comments on: ``Hierarchical inference for genome-wide association studies: a view on methodology with software
This page was built for publication: Choosing between methods of combining $p$-values