A Counterpoint to Cermelli and Gurtin’s Criteria for Choosing the ‘Correct’ Geometric Dislocation Tensor in Finite Plasticity
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5391684
DOI10.1007/978-1-4020-9090-5_9zbMath1209.74017OpenAlexW1001087653MaRDI QIDQ5391684
Publication date: 7 April 2011
Published in: IUTAM BookSeries (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9090-5_9
Related Items (5)
Finite element approximation of finite deformation dislocation mechanics ⋮ A fourth-order gauge-invariant gradient plasticity model for polycrystals based on Kröner’s incompatibility tensor ⋮ A Variational Approach to Single Crystals with Dislocations ⋮ Riemann-Cartan geometry of nonlinear dislocation mechanics ⋮ Characterizing geometrically necessary dislocations using an elastic-plastic decomposition of Laplace stretch
Cites Work
- Constitutive analysis of finite deformation field dislocation mechanics
- Lattice incompatibility and a gradient theory of crystal plasticity
- Second-order effects of dislocations in anisotropic crystals
- A model of crystal plasticity based on the theory of continuously distributed dislocations
- On the characterization of geometrically necessary dislocations in finite plasticity
- A gradient theory of single-crystal viscoplasticity that accounts for geometrically necessary dislocations
This page was built for publication: A Counterpoint to Cermelli and Gurtin’s Criteria for Choosing the ‘Correct’ Geometric Dislocation Tensor in Finite Plasticity
