Can Nonrandomized Experiments Yield Accurate Answers? A Randomized Experiment Comparing Random and Nonrandom Assignments
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5414006
DOI10.1198/016214508000000733zbMath1286.62013OpenAlexW2068144165WikidataQ56706023 ScholiaQ56706023MaRDI QIDQ5414006
M. H. Clark, Peter M. Steiner, William R. Shadish
Publication date: 2 May 2014
Published in: Journal of the American Statistical Association (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000733
Related Items (8)
Robust machine learning for treatment effects in multilevel observational studies under cluster-level unmeasured confounding ⋮ Estimating causal effects with optimization-based methods: a review and empirical comparison ⋮ Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward ⋮ Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: lessons learned from a data analysis competition ⋮ Comment: Will competition-winning methods for causal inference also succeed in practice? ⋮ Comment: strengthening empirical evaluation of causal inference methods ⋮ Comment: causal inference competitions: where should we aim? ⋮ Bias and High-Dimensional Adjustment in Observational Studies of Peer Effects
This page was built for publication: Can Nonrandomized Experiments Yield Accurate Answers? A Randomized Experiment Comparing Random and Nonrandom Assignments
