The role of data transfer on the selection of a single vs. multiple mesh architecture for tightly coupled multiphysics applications
From MaRDI portal
Publication:547951
DOI10.1016/j.amc.2011.03.101zbMath1219.68098OpenAlexW2008383281MaRDI QIDQ547951
Glen Hansen, Richard W. Johnson, Chris Newman
Publication date: 27 June 2011
Published in: Applied Mathematics and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.03.101
Related Items (2)
An updated Lagrangian method with error estimation and adaptive remeshing for very large deformation elasticity problems ⋮ Mesh-free data transfer algorithms for partitioned multiphysics problems: conservation, accuracy, and parallelism
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Comparison of multimesh \(hp\)-FEM to interpolation and projection methods for spatial coupling of thermal and neutron diffusion calculations
- Conservative rezoning (remapping) for general quadrilateral meshes
- Monolithic discretization of linear thermoelasticity problems via adaptive multimesh \(hp\)-FEM
- Simplified second-order rezoning algorithm for generalized two- dimensional meshes
- Conservative rezoning algorithm for generalized two-dimensional meshes
- Conservative remapping and region overlays by intersecting arbitrary polyhedra
- Studies of the accuracy of time integration methods for reaction-diffusion equations.
- The continuous Galerkin method is locally conservative
- On multi-mesh \(H\)-adaptive methods
- Assessment of conservative load transfer for fluid-solid interface with non-matching meshes
- Accurate Conservative Remapping (Rezoning) for Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Computations
- Common‐refinement‐based data transfer between non‐matching meshes in multiphysics simulations
This page was built for publication: The role of data transfer on the selection of a single vs. multiple mesh architecture for tightly coupled multiphysics applications
