Models and Statistical Inference: The Controversy between Fisher and Neyman–Pearson
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5492043
DOI10.1093/BJPS/AXI152zbMath1138.62301OpenAlexW1982941892WikidataQ55885158 ScholiaQ55885158MaRDI QIDQ5492043
Publication date: 12 October 2006
Published in: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axi152
Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01) History of mathematics in the 20th century (01A60)
Related Items (4)
Coal to diamonds ⋮ Non-Experimental Data, Hypothesis Testing, and the Likelihood Principle: A Social Science Perspective ⋮ Controlling the error probabilities of model selection information criteria using bootstrapping ⋮ Before p < 0.05 to Beyond p < 0.05: Using History to Contextualize p-Values and Significance Testing
This page was built for publication: Models and Statistical Inference: The Controversy between Fisher and Neyman–Pearson