Should Silence be Heard? Fair Rational Secret Sharing with Silent and Non-silent Players

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-12280-9_16zbMATH Open1436.94053OpenAlexW150693687MaRDI QIDQ5498732

Asim K. Pal, Sourya Joyee de, Sushmita Ruj

Publication date: 10 February 2015

Published in: Cryptology and Network Security (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12280-9_16

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Cryptography (94A60)

Related Items (1)

Impact of keeping silence on spatial reciprocity in spatial games

Recommendations

• Using or hiding private information? An experimental study of zero-sum repeated games with incomplete information 👍 👎
• Private communication in competing mechanism games 👍 👎
• Utility dependence in correct and fair rational secret sharing 👍 👎
• Proactive Secret Sharing with a Dishonest Majority 👍 👎
• Utility Dependence in Correct and Fair Rational Secret Sharing 👍 👎
• Realistic versus Rational Secret Sharing 👍 👎
• Rational Secret Sharing, Revisited 👍 👎
• How to Share Secrets: The Idea of Geometric Threshold Games 👍 👎
• Brief Announcement 👍 👎

This page was built for publication: Should Silence be Heard? Fair Rational Secret Sharing with Silent and Non-silent Players

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5498732)