Ordinal ranking methods for multicriterion decision making

DOI<link itemprop=identifier href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199608)43:5<613::AID-NAV2>3.0.CO;2-8" /><613::AID-NAV2>3.0.CO;2-8 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199608)43:5<613::AID-NAV2>3.0.CO;2-8zbMath0864.90068OpenAlexW2088648776MaRDI QIDQ5687638

Zachary F. Lansdowne

Publication date: 21 January 1997

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6750(199608)43:5<613::aid-nav2>3.0.co;2-8

zbMATH Keywords

multiple criteriamultiple alternativesordinal ranking methodoverall ranking of alternatives

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Related Items (11)

A comparison between the prudent order and the ranking obtained with Borda's, Copeland's, Slater's and Kemeny's rules ⋮ Rank-based modelling of preferences in multi-criteria decision making ⋮ Towards a theory of MCDM: Stepping away from social choice theory ⋮ Une typologie des méthodes multicritères: Proposition d'un cadre méthodologique ⋮ Aggregation of ordinal data using ordered weighted averaging operator weights ⋮ Characterizations of the 3-cycle count and backward length of a tournament ⋮ A characterization of prudent choices ⋮ DETERMINING AGGREGATE CRITERIA WEIGHTS FROM CRITERIA RANKINGS BY A GROUP OF DECISION MAKERS ⋮ A prudent characterization of the ranked pairs rule ⋮ A characterization of the prudent order preference function ⋮ Combining expert judgment: On the performance of trimmed mean vote aggregation procedures in the presence of strategic voting

This page was built for publication: Ordinal ranking methods for multicriterion decision making