A METHODOLOGICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN STANDARD AND TWO STAGE MIXED INTEGER APPROACHES FOR DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5716135
DOI10.1142/S0217595905000704zbMath1159.90465MaRDI QIDQ5716135
Publication date: 9 January 2006
Published in: Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects) (62H30) Mixed integer programming (90C11)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- DEA-discriminant analysis in the view of goal programming
- Simple but powerful goal programming models for discriminant problems
- Goal programming and multiple objective optimizations. Part I
- Arbitrary-norm separating plane
- Nontraditional approaches to statistical classification: Some perspectives on \(L_ p\)-norm methods
- Mixed integer programming approach of extended DEA--discriminant analysis.
- An iterative mixed integer programming method for classification accuracy maximizing discriminant analysis
- DEA-discriminant analysis: methodological comparison among eight discriminant analysis approaches
- Optimal Estimation of Executive Compensation by Linear Programming
- Integer programming methods for normalisation and variable selection in mathematical programming discriminant analysis models
- Efficiency measurement and strategic classification of Japanese banking institutions
- Classification accuracy in discriminant analysis: a mixed integer programming approach
- Multisurface method of pattern separation
- Extended DEA-discriminant analysis
- A comparison of prediction accuracy, complexity, and training time of thirty-three old and new classification algorithms
This page was built for publication: A METHODOLOGICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN STANDARD AND TWO STAGE MIXED INTEGER APPROACHES FOR DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS