Coalitions of arguments: A tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks

DOI10.1002/int.20389zbMath1185.68704OpenAlexW4235694400MaRDI QIDQ5851696

Claudette Cayrol, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex

Publication date: 25 January 2010

Published in: International Journal of Intelligent Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20389

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Related Items (11)

Dialogue Games for Argumentation Frameworks with Necessities ⋮ Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation ⋮ A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks ⋮ Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation ⋮ AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks ⋮ A socio-cognitive model of trust using argumentation theory ⋮ Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches ⋮ A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation ⋮ Proximity semantics for topic-based abstract argumentation ⋮ A comprehensive study of argumentation frameworks with sets of attacking arguments ⋮ Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions
• Collective Argumentation and Disjunctive Logic Programming
• On cliques in graphs
• Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: The HERMES system

This page was built for publication: Coalitions of arguments: A tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks