Comparing the performance of statistical methods that generalize effect estimates from randomized controlled trials to much larger target populations
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5867468
DOI10.1080/03610918.2020.1741621OpenAlexW3011809752MaRDI QIDQ5867468
Benjamin Ackerman, Hwanhee Hong, Trang Quynh Nguyen, Marissa J. Seamans, Ian Schmid, Kara E. Rudolph, Elizabeth A. Stuart
Publication date: 14 September 2022
Published in: Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2020.1741621
Uses Software
Cites Work
- BART: Bayesian additive regression trees
- Demystifying double robustness: a comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data
- Comment: Performance of double-robust estimators when ``inverse probability weights are highly variable
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
- Robust Estimation of Encouragement Design Intervention Effects Transported Across Sites
- A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect
- Super Learner
This page was built for publication: Comparing the performance of statistical methods that generalize effect estimates from randomized controlled trials to much larger target populations
