Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5868219
DOI10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913OpenAlexW2922853138WikidataQ62130979 ScholiaQ62130979MaRDI QIDQ5868219
No author found.
Publication date: 20 September 2022
Published in: The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913
Related Items (44)
Bootstrapped inference for variance parameters, measures of heterogeneity and random effects in multilevel logistic regression models ⋮ Revisiting noncentrality-based confidence intervals, error probabilities and estimation-based effect sizes ⋮ Book Review ⋮ Using weighted differences in hazards as effect sizes for survival data ⋮ Publication Policies for Replicable Research and the Community-Wide False Discovery Rate ⋮ Comparative Probability Metrics: Using Posterior Probabilities to Account for Practical Equivalence in A/B tests ⋮ Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Interpreted and Calibrated by Estimating Probabilities of Sign Errors: A Bayes-Frequentist Continuum ⋮ Toward Replicability With Confidence Intervals for the Exceedance Probability ⋮ Adjusting Published Estimates for Exploratory Biases Using the Truncated Normal Distribution ⋮ From One Environment to Many: The Problem of Replicability of Statistical Inferences ⋮ Illustrating Randomness in Statistics Courses With Spatial Experiments ⋮ Comments on: ``Hierarchical inference for genome-wide association studies: a view on methodology with software ⋮ Exact-Corrected Confidence Interval for Risk Difference in Noninferiority Binomial Trials ⋮ Unlucky Number 13? Manipulating Evidence Subject to Snooping ⋮ The significance filter, the winner's curse and the need to shrink ⋮ Connecting simple and precise P‐values to complex and ambiguous realities (includes rejoinder to comments on “Divergence vs. decision P‐values”) ⋮ Can \(p\)-values be meaningfully interpreted without random sampling? ⋮ Applying generalized funnel plots to help design statistical analyses ⋮ Fisher's disjunction as the principle vindicating \(p\)-values, confidence intervals, and their generalizations: a frequentist semantics for possibility theory ⋮ A Statistical Basis for Reporting Strength of Evidence as Pool Reduction ⋮ The case of the Jeffreys-Lindley-paradox as a Bayes-frequentist compromise: a perspective based on the Rao-Lovric-theorem ⋮ The \(p\)-value interpreted as the posterior probability of explaining the data: applications to multiple testing and to restricted parameter spaces ⋮ Non-Experimental Data, Hypothesis Testing, and the Likelihood Principle: A Social Science Perspective ⋮ The evidence interval and the Bayesian evidence value: On a unified theory for Bayesian hypothesis testing and interval estimation ⋮ Fiducialize statistical significance: transformingp-values into conservative posterior probabilities and Bayes factors ⋮ A horseshoe mixture model for Bayesian screening with an application to light sheet fluorescence microscopy in brain imaging ⋮ Power analysis and sample size planning in ANCOVA designs ⋮ A robust effect size index ⋮ Accurate confidence and Bayesian interval estimation for non-centrality parameters and effect size indices ⋮ Normality and significance testing in simple linear regression model for large sample sizes: a simulation study ⋮ Interpreting tests of a hypothesis at multiple alpha levels within a Neyman-Pearson framework ⋮ Bernoulli's golden theorem in retrospect: error probabilities and trustworthy evidence ⋮ What type of Type I error? Contrasting the Neyman-Pearson and Fisherian approaches in the context of exact and direct replications ⋮ Power analysis and type I and type II error rates of Bayesian nonparametric two-sample tests for location-shifts based on the Bayes factor under Cauchy priors ⋮ Handbook of Statistical Methods for Case-Control Studies. ⋮ Type I and II error rates of Bayesian two-sample tests under preliminary assessment of normality in balanced and unbalanced designs and its influence on the reproducibility of medical research ⋮ Evidence for goodness of fit in Karl Pearson chi-squared statistics ⋮ Relationships between \(p\)-values and Pearson correlation coefficients, type 1 errors and effect size errors, under a true null hypothesis ⋮ The impact of public expenditure on economic growth of provinces and cities in the southern key economic zone of Vietnam: Bayesian approach ⋮ Interpreting \(p\)-values and confidence intervals using well-calibrated null preference priors ⋮ Significance test for linear regression: how to test without P-values? ⋮ The Other Arbitrary Cutoff ⋮ Coup de Grâce for a Tough Old Bull: “Statistically Significant” Expires ⋮ Interval estimation, point estimation, and null hypothesis significance testing calibrated by an estimated posterior probability of the null hypothesis
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Statistical Inference as Severe Testing
- A critical evaluation of the current “p‐value controversy”
- What Have We (Not) Learnt from Millions of Scientific Papers with P Values?
- Why is Getting Rid of P-Values So Hard? Musings on Science and Statistics
- Will the ASA's Efforts to Improve Statistical Practice be Successful? Some Evidence to the Contrary
- Correcting Corrupt Research: Recommendations for the Profession to Stop Misuse of p-Values
- Quality Control for Scientific Research: Addressing Reproducibility, Responsiveness, and Relevance
- The Role of Expert Judgment in Statistical Inference and Evidence-Based Decision-Making
- Expert Knowledge Elicitation: Subjective but Scientific
- Before p < 0.05 to Beyond p < 0.05: Using History to Contextualize p-Values and Significance Testing
- The Limited Role of Formal Statistical Inference in Scientific Inference
- Large-Scale Replication Projects in Contemporary Psychological Research
- ValidP-Values Behave Exactly as They Should: Some Misleading Criticisms ofP-Values and Their Resolution WithS-Values
- The p-Value Requires Context, Not a Threshold
- Assessing Statistical Results: Magnitude, Precision, and Model Uncertainty
- Putting the P-Value in its Place
- Evidence From Marginally Significant t Statistics
- The p-value Function and Statistical Inference
- p-Values, Bayes Factors, and Sufficiency
- Limitations of P-Values and R-squared for Stepwise Regression Building: A Fairness Demonstration in Health Policy Risk Adjustment
- An Introduction to Second-Generation p-Values
- A Proposed Hybrid Effect Size Plus p-Value Criterion: Empirical Evidence Supporting its Use
- Three Recommendations for Improving the Use of p-Values
- The False Positive Risk: A Proposal Concerning What to Do About p-Values
- Moving Towards the Post p < 0.05 Era via the Analysis of Credibility
- Blending Bayesian and Classical Tools to Define Optimal Sample-Size-Dependent Significance Levels
- How Effect Size (Practical Significance) Misleads Clinical Practice: The Case for Switching to Practical Benefit to Assess Applied Research Findings
- Abandon Statistical Significance
- Statistical Inference Enables Bad Science; Statistical Thinking Enables Good Science
- Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication
- The New Statistics for Better Science: Ask How Much, How Uncertain, and What Else Is Known
- How Large Are Your G-Values? Try Gosset’s Guinnessometrics When a Little “p” Is Not Enough
- Predictive Inference and Scientific Reproducibility
- Treatment Choice With Trial Data: Statistical Decision Theory Should Supplant Hypothesis Testing
- Trial Size for Near-Optimal Choice Between Surveillance and Aggressive Treatment: Reconsidering MSLT-II
- Frequentist, Bayes, or Other?
- Inference and Decision Making for 21st-Century Drug Development and Approval
- Multiple Perspectives on Inference for Two Simple Statistical Scenarios
- Five Nonobvious Changes in Editorial Practice for Editors and Reviewers to Consider When Evaluating Submissions in a Post p < 0.05 Universe
- The Impact of Results Blind Science Publishing on Statistical Consultation and Collaboration
- Coup de Grâce for a Tough Old Bull: “Statistically Significant” Expires
- The World of Research Has Gone Berserk: Modeling the Consequences of Requiring “Greater Statistical Stringency” for Scientific Publication
- Assessing the Statistical Analyses Used in Basic and Applied Social Psychology After Their p-Value Ban
- Content Audit for p-value Principles in Introductory Statistics
- Beyond Calculations: A Course in Statistical Thinking
- The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
This page was built for publication: Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”