The Role of Expert Judgment in Statistical Inference and Evidence-Based Decision-Making

DOI10.1080/00031305.2018.1529623OpenAlexW2925077949WikidataQ64068508 ScholiaQ64068508MaRDI QIDQ5868227

Jane F. Pendergast, Anthony O'Hagan, N. C. Brownstein, Thomas A. Louis

Publication date: 20 September 2022

Published in: The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1529623

zbMATH Keywords

clinical trialscollaborationelicitationBayesian paradigmsubjectivityscientific method

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Related Items

Expert Kaplan–Meier estimation ⋮ Influential sources of uncertainty in glyphosate biochemical degradation in soil ⋮ Comment: ``Bayes, oracle Bayes, and empirical Bayes ⋮ Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05” ⋮ Quality Control for Scientific Research: Addressing Reproducibility, Responsiveness, and Relevance ⋮ Expert Knowledge Elicitation: Subjective but Scientific

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Networks
• A Definition of Subjective Probability
• Leadership in Statistics: Increasing Our Value and Visibility
• The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose

This page was built for publication: The Role of Expert Judgment in Statistical Inference and Evidence-Based Decision-Making