Five Nonobvious Changes in Editorial Practice for Editors and Reviewers to Consider When Evaluating Submissions in a Post p < 0.05 Universe

DOI10.1080/00031305.2018.1537888OpenAlexW2925105812MaRDI QIDQ5868276

David Trafimow

Publication date: 20 September 2022

Published in: The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1537888

zbMATH Keywords

a priori procedureeditorial changeseditorial practicesjournal practices

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Related Items (3)

Can \(p\)-values be meaningfully interpreted without random sampling? ⋮ The Other Arbitrary Cutoff ⋮ Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”

Cites Work

• Using i.i.d. bootstrap inference for general non-i.i.d. models
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Five Nonobvious Changes in Editorial Practice for Editors and Reviewers to Consider When Evaluating Submissions in a Post p < 0.05 Universe