Assessing the Statistical Analyses Used in Basic and Applied Social Psychology After Their p-Value Ban

DOI10.1080/00031305.2018.1537892OpenAlexW2922705716MaRDI QIDQ5868282

Xiaoyan Han, Katherine Burke, William H. Woodall, Ronald D. Jun. Fricker

Publication date: 20 September 2022

Published in: The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1537892

zbMATH Keywords

statistical significancepsychologyeffect sizeNHSTinference ban

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Related Items (5)

Toward Replicability With Confidence Intervals for the Exceedance Probability ⋮ Illustrating Randomness in Statistics Courses With Spatial Experiments ⋮ Unlucky Number 13? Manipulating Evidence Subject to Snooping ⋮ False confidence, non-additive beliefs, and valid statistical inference ⋮ Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence
• The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose

This page was built for publication: Assessing the Statistical Analyses Used in Basic and Applied Social Psychology After Their p-Value Ban