Towards Evidence Retrieval Cost Reduction in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Fallible Evidence

DOI10.1613/jair.1.13639OpenAlexW4311920733MaRDI QIDQ5870514

Sebastian Gottifredi, Guillermo R. Simari, Andrea Cohen, Alejandro Javier García

Publication date: 9 January 2023

Published in: Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.13639

zbMATH Keywords

automated reasoningknowledge representationnonmonotonic reasoning

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Artificial intelligence (68Txx)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• An approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systems
• Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
• Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
• Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
• Using argument strength for building dialectical bonsai
• On topology-related properties of abstract argumentation semantics. A correction and extension to ``Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
• Towards a Common Framework for Dialectical Proof Procedures in Abstract Argumentation
• Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
• A Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of ASPIC⁺ and DeLP
• A logic-based theory of deductive arguments

This page was built for publication: Towards Evidence Retrieval Cost Reduction in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Fallible Evidence