Towards Evidence Retrieval Cost Reduction in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Fallible Evidence
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5870514
DOI10.1613/jair.1.13639OpenAlexW4311920733MaRDI QIDQ5870514
Sebastian Gottifredi, Guillermo R. Simari, Andrea Cohen, Alejandro Javier García
Publication date: 9 January 2023
Published in: Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.13639
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- An approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systems
- Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
- Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
- Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Using argument strength for building dialectical bonsai
- On topology-related properties of abstract argumentation semantics. A correction and extension to ``Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
- Towards a Common Framework for Dialectical Proof Procedures in Abstract Argumentation
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- A Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of ASPIC+ and DeLP
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
This page was built for publication: Towards Evidence Retrieval Cost Reduction in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Fallible Evidence